Which of the Following Is Not Considered Art or Design
1.3: Who is Considered an Artist? What Does information technology Mean to be an Artist?
- Page ID
- 10110
In much of the world today, an artist is considered to be a person with the talent and the skills to anticipate and brand creative works. Such persons are singled out and prized for their artistic and original ideas. Their art works can take many forms and fit into numerous categories, such as compages, ceramics, digital fine art, drawings, mixed media, paintings, photographs, prints, sculpture, and textiles. Of greater importance, artists are the individuals who have the desire and ability to envision, blueprint, and fabricate the images, objects, and structures nosotros all run across, use, occupy, and enjoy every mean solar day of our lives.
Today, equally has been the case throughout history and across cultures, at that place are different titles for those who make and build. An artisan or craftsperson, for case, may produce decorative or utilitarian arts, such equally quilts or baskets. Oftentimes, an artisan or craftsperson is a skilled worker, merely not the inventor of the original idea or form. An artisan or craftsperson tin also be someone who creates their own designs, merely does not piece of work in art forms or with materials traditionally associated with the so-chosen Fine Arts, such as painting and sculpture. A craftsperson might instead fashion jewelry, forge iron, or blow drinking glass into patterns and objects of their own devising. Such inventive and skilled pieces are often categorized today every bit Fine Craft or Craft Art.
In many cultures throughout much of history, those who produced, embellished, painted, and built were non considered to exist artists every bit we think of them now. They were artisans and craftspeople, and their function was to brand the objects and build the structures for which they were hired, according to the design (their own or another's) agreed upon with those for whom they were working. That is not to say they were untrained. In Medieval Europe, or the Middle Ages (fifth-fifteenth centuries), for example, an artisan mostly began effectually the historic period of twelve as an apprentice, that is, a educatee who learned all aspects of a profession from a chief who had their own workshop. Apprenticeships lasted 5 to 9 years or more, and included learning trades ranging from painting to baking, and masonry to candle making. At the terminate of that menses, an apprentice became a journeyman and was allowed to become a member of the arts and crafts lodge that supervised training and standards for those working in that merchandise. To achieve full status in the order, a journeyman had to complete their "masterpiece," demonstrating sufficient skill and craftsmanship to be named a master.
We accept little information almost how artists trained in numerous other fourth dimension periods and cultures, but nosotros can gain some understanding of what it meant to be an creative person past looking at examples of art work that were produced. Seated Statue of Gudea depicts the ruler of the country of Lagash in Southern Mesopotamia, today Republic of iraq, during his reign, c. 2144-2124 BCE (Figure i.ten).
Figure 1.10 Gudea, Author: Met Museum, (OASC).
Gudea is known for building temples, many in the kingdom's main city of Girsu (today Telloh, Iraq), with statues portraying himself in them. In these works, he is seated or standing with wide, staring optics but otherwise a calm expression on his face and his hands folded in a gesture of prayer and greeting. Many of the statues, including the i pictured here, are carved from diorite, a very hard rock favored by rulers in ancient Egypt and the Near E for its rarity and the fine lines that tin can be cut into information technology. The ability to cut such precise lines immune the craftsperson who carved this work to distinguish betwixt and emphasize each finger in Gudea's clasped hands as well as the circular patterns on his stylized shepherd's lid, both of which point the leader's dedication to the well-being and safety of his people.
Although the sculpture of Gudea was clearly carved by a skilled artisan, we accept no tape of that person, or of the vast bulk of the artisans and builders who worked in the ancient world. Who they worked for and what they created are the records of their lives and artistry. Artisans were not valued for taking an original arroyo and setting themselves autonomously when creating a statue of a ruler such equally Gudea: their success was based on their ability to work within standards of how the homo form was depicted and specifically how a leader should look within that culture at that time. The large, almond-shaped eyes and meaty, block-similar shape of the figure, for instance, are typical of sculpture from that period. This sculpture is not intended to be an private likeness of Gudea; rather, information technology is a depiction of the characteristic features, pose, and proportions found in all art of that time and place.
Objects made out of clay were far more common in the aboriginal world than those made of metallic or stone, such every bit the Seated Statue of Gudea, which were far more costly, time-consuming, and difficult to make. Human figures modeled in dirt dating back as far equally 29,000-25,000 BCE have been found in Europe, and the earliest known pottery, found in Jiangxi Province, Red china, dates to c. 18,000 BCE. Vessels fabricated of clay and baked in ovens were commencement made in the Near Eastward c. eight,000 BCE, most six,000 years before the Seated Statue of Gudea was carved. Ceramic (clay hardened by heat) pots were used for storage and numerous everyday needs. They were utilitarian objects made by anonymous artisans.
Amid the ancient Greeks, notwithstanding, pottery rose to the level of an art form. Just, the status of the individuals who created and painted the pots did not. Although their work may have been sought after, these potters and painters were nevertheless considered artisans. The origins of pottery that can exist described as distinctively Greek dates to c. 1,000 BCE, in what is known equally the Proto-geometric flow. Over the adjacent several hundred years, the shapes of the vessels and the types of decorative motifs and subjects painted on them became associated with the city where they were produced, and and then specifically with the individuals who made and decorated the pots. The types of pots signed past the potter and the painter were generally big, elaborately decorated or otherwise specialized vessels that were used for ritual or ceremonial purposes.
That is the case with the Panathenaic Prize Amphora, 363-362 BCE, signed by Nikodemos, the potter, and attributed to the Painter of the Wedding Procession, whose name is not known but is identified through similarities to other painted pots (Figure 1.eleven). The Panathenaia was a festival held every iv years in honor of Athena, the patron goddess of Athens, Greece, who is depicted on the amphora, a tall, 2-handled jar with a narrow neck. On the other side of the storage jar, Nike, the goddess of victory, crowns the winner of the boxing competition for which this pot—containing precious olive oil from Athena'due south sacred trees—was awarded by the city of Athens. Only the all-time potters and painters were hired to make pots that were part of such an important ceremony and holding such a pregnant prize. While the vast majority of artisans never identified themselves on their work, these noteworthy individuals were fix apart and acknowledged by name. The makers' signatures demonstrated the city'south desire to give an award of the highest quality; they acted as promotion for the potter and painter at that time, and they have immortalized them since. It must non exist forgotten, however, that the prize inside the pot was considered far more important than the vessel or the skilled artisans who created it.
Effigy 1.xi Panathenaic Prize Amphora with Lid, Creative person: Nikodemos, Author: The J. Paul Getty Museum, (open up content)
Cathay was united and ruled by Mongols from the north, first under Kublai Kahn, in the period known every bit the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368). The hand scroll painting Pear Blossoms was created with ink and colors on paper around 1280 by Qian Xuan (c. 1235-before 1307, Communist china). (Effigy one.12) Subsequently the establishment of the Mongolian government, Qian Xuan abandoned his goal of obtaining a position every bit a scholar-official, equally the highly educated bureaucrats who governed China were known, and turned to painting. He was part of a group of artists known as scholar-painters, or literati. The work of scholar-painters was desirable to many admirers of art considering it was considered more personal, expressive, and spontaneous than the compatible and realistic paintings by professional, trained artists. The scholar-painters' sophisticated and deep knowledge of philosophy, civilisation, and the arts— including calligraphy—made them welcome amid fellow scholars and at courtroom. They were part of the aristocracy class of leaders, who followed the long and noble traditions within Confucian teachings of expressing oneself with wisdom and grace, especially in the fine art of poetry.
Figure ane.12 Pear Blossoms, Artist: Qian Xuan, Writer: Met Museum, (OASC)
Cathay was united and ruled by Mongols from the north, first under Kublai Kahn, in the catamenia known as the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368). The hand ringlet painting Pear Blossoms was created with ink and colors on paper effectually 1280 by Qian Xuan (c. 1235-before 1307, People's republic of china). (Figure i.12) After the institution of the Mongolian government, Qian Xuan abandoned his goal of obtaining a position as a scholar-official, equally the highly educated bureaucrats who governed China were known, and turned to painting. He was role of a group of artists known every bit scholar-painters, or literati. The work of scholar-painters was desirable to many admirers of art considering information technology was considered more personal, expressive, and spontaneous than the uniform and realistic paintings by professional person, trained artists. The scholar-painters' sophisticated and deep knowledge of philosophy, culture, and the arts— including calligraphy—made them welcome amidst fellow scholars and at courtroom. They were role of the elite class of leaders, who followed the long and noble traditions within Confucian teachings of expressing oneself with wisdom and grace, especially in the fine art of poesy.
Qian Xuan was ane of the kickoff scholar-painters to unite painting and poetry, as he does in Pear Blossoms:
All alone by the veranda railing,
teardrops drenching the branches,
Although her face is unadorned,
her old charms remain;
Backside the locked gate, on a rainy night,
how she is filled with sadness.
How differently she looked bathed in aureate waves
of moonlight, before the darkness roughshod.
The poem is non meant to illustrate or describe his painting of the co-operative with its fragile, immature foliage and flowers; rather, the swaying, irregular lines of the leaves and the gently unfurling curves of the blossoms are meant to suggest comparisons to how chop-chop time passes—frail blooms will soon fade—and evoke memories of times by.
In thirteenth-century China, as has been the case throughout much of that state'southward history, the significance of a painting is closely associated with the identity of the artist, and with the scholars and collectors who owned the work over subsequent centuries. Their identities are known by the seals, or stamps in red interim as a signature, each added to the work of fine art. Specific subjects and how they were depicted were associated with the artist, and often referred back to in later works by other artists equally a sign of respect and acquittance of the earlier master'due south skill and expertise. In Pear Blossoms, as was oftentimes the instance, the poem, and the calligraphy in which the artist wrote it, were part of the original composition of the entire painted ringlet. The seals appended and notes written by after scholars and collectors continued calculation to the limerick, and its dazzler and meaning, over the next seven hundred years.
When James Abbott McNeill Whistler (1834-1903, United states, lived England) painted Arrangement in Mankind Colour and Blackness, Portrait of Theodore Duret in 1883, he was making references back to the makers' marks Chinese and Japanese potters used as signatures on their ceramics in the monogram he adopted for his work: a stylized design of a butterfly based on his initials. (Effigy 1.13) Whistler began signing his work with the recognizable simply altered effigy of a butterfly, which oftentimes appeared to exist dancing, in the 1860s. He had begun collecting Japanese porcelain and prints, and was tremendously influenced by their colors, patterns, and compositions, which reflected Japanese principles of beauty in art, including elegant simplicity, tranquility, subtlety, naturalness, understated beauty, and asymmetry or irregularity.
Figure 1.13 Organization in Flesh Colour and Black: Portrait of Theodore Duret, Artist: James Abbott McNeill Whistler, Writer: Met Museum, (OASC)
Whistler was among numerous American and European artists in the 2nd one-half of the nineteenth century who felt compelled to break away from what they believed were the inhibiting constraints in how and what fine art students were taught and in the system of traditional art exhibitions. For Whistler and others, such restrictions were intolerable; every bit artists, they must exist allowed to freely follow their own creative voices and pursuits. In adopting Japanese principles of beauty in fine art, Whistler could pursue what he chosen "Art for art's sake." That is, he could create art that served no other purpose than to express what he, as the artist, plant to be elevating, harmonious, and pleasing to the middle, the mind, and the soul:
Art should be contained of all claptrap—should stand up alone, and entreatment to the artistic sense of middle or ear, without confounding this with emotions entirely strange to it, as devotion, pity, love, patriotism, and the similar. All these accept no kind of concern with information technology; and that is why I insist on calling my works "arrangements" and "harmonies."4
Setting the artist autonomously in this way, as someone with special qualifications and sensibilities at odds with the prevailing cultural and intellectual standards, was far from the role played by a scholar-painter such equally Qian Xuan in thirteenth-century China. The piece of work Qian Xuan created was in accord with prevailing standards, while Whistler oftentimes thought of himself and his fine art as conflicting with the conventions of his day. Continuing ane notion or categorization of the artist that had been present in Europe since the sixteenth century (and, afterwards, the United States), Whistler was the singular, creative genius, whose art was often misunderstood and not necessarily accepted.
That was indeed the instance. In 1878, Whistler won a lawsuit for libel against the art critic John Ruskin, who described Whistler's 1875 painting, Nocturne in Black and Gold: The Falling Rocket, as "flinging a pot of paint in the public's face." (Figure ane.14) By effectually 1880, in the aftermath of that rancorous proceeding, Whistler often added a long stinger to his butterfly monogram, symbolizing both the gentle beauty of his art also as the forceful, at times stinging, nature of his personality.
four James Abbott McNeill Whistler, The Gentle Art of Making Enemies (New York: Frederick Stokes & Blood brother, 1908), www. gutenberg.org/files/24650/24650-h/24650-h.html
Source: https://human.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Art/Book%3A_Introduction_to_Art_-_Design_Context_and_Meaning_(Sachant_et_al.)/01%3A_What_is_Art/1.03%3A_Who_is_Considered_an_Artist_What_Does_it_Mean_to_be_an_Artist